<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/</link>
	<description>Exploring social media and public relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:01:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caterina</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-689660</link>
		<dc:creator>Caterina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-689660</guid>
		<description>The increasing interest in social media networks illustrated a very different perception of the public in my mind. I imagined the desire for greater on-line social networks, represented a desire for a more technologically based world. “The New PR” presents a novel perspective on the relationship betweenthe public and on-line networks. If I understand correctly, people use these online networks to achieve a sense of community. 

I’m very much captivated by your attempt to understand individual relationships within a public to make up  this idea of community. This goes beyond PR’s traditional attempt to go simply comprehend a publics relationship to the media. I think there is something completely ironic with the fact that society has a desire for the nostalgic. How much of PR’s previous school of thought should be completely abandoned? Or highly integrated? For example, how far should PR practitioners separate ourselves from the idea of a “target audience”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The increasing interest in social media networks illustrated a very different perception of the public in my mind. I imagined the desire for greater on-line social networks, represented a desire for a more technologically based world. “The New PR” presents a novel perspective on the relationship betweenthe public and on-line networks. If I understand correctly, people use these online networks to achieve a sense of community. </p>
<p>I’m very much captivated by your attempt to understand individual relationships within a public to make up  this idea of community. This goes beyond PR’s traditional attempt to go simply comprehend a publics relationship to the media. I think there is something completely ironic with the fact that society has a desire for the nostalgic. How much of PR’s previous school of thought should be completely abandoned? Or highly integrated? For example, how far should PR practitioners separate ourselves from the idea of a “target audience”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna Stothers</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-680477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna Stothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-680477</guid>
		<description>This post caught my attention because it defines public relations in an ideal way for me. As a PR student, I’m constantly searching for different fields, industries and tools that will help pave a career path for me in public relations. Two buzzwords stood out to me in this blog post: community and social media. These terms continue to pop up on Twitter, on company websites, and in class. I enjoy hearing how agencies are using social media to develop a greater sense of community. 

I’m happy to hear that public relations agencies are using new tools to create and maintain relationships with clients. You asked, “How far can we push social media’s ability to transcend the limitations of geographic proximity and bring people together in one conversation, regardless of where they are in the world?”

 I just wrote a blog post about the social network application called Foursquare, which enables users to “check in” via their mobile phones to venues all across the city. It uses geo-tagging abilities to suggest new restaurants and bars to try in the neighbourhood, and facilitates social networking on a new level. I’m intrigued by the idea of using social networking applications like Foursquare and Twitter to develop relationships with clients/useful contacts/strangers instead of more traditional methods of PR like you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post caught my attention because it defines public relations in an ideal way for me. As a PR student, I’m constantly searching for different fields, industries and tools that will help pave a career path for me in public relations. Two buzzwords stood out to me in this blog post: community and social media. These terms continue to pop up on Twitter, on company websites, and in class. I enjoy hearing how agencies are using social media to develop a greater sense of community. </p>
<p>I’m happy to hear that public relations agencies are using new tools to create and maintain relationships with clients. You asked, “How far can we push social media’s ability to transcend the limitations of geographic proximity and bring people together in one conversation, regardless of where they are in the world?”</p>
<p> I just wrote a blog post about the social network application called Foursquare, which enables users to “check in” via their mobile phones to venues all across the city. It uses geo-tagging abilities to suggest new restaurants and bars to try in the neighbourhood, and facilitates social networking on a new level. I’m intrigued by the idea of using social networking applications like Foursquare and Twitter to develop relationships with clients/useful contacts/strangers instead of more traditional methods of PR like you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Thornley</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677517</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Thornley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677517</guid>
		<description>Dave, Your parents aren&#039;t that much different from a lot of commentators that I hear criticizing the PR industry. They don&#039;t understand PR either. In fact, they&#039;re criticizing the stereotype of PR that they acquired years ago - and that stereotype has not kept up with the reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, Your parents aren&#8217;t that much different from a lot of commentators that I hear criticizing the PR industry. They don&#8217;t understand PR either. In fact, they&#8217;re criticizing the stereotype of PR that they acquired years ago &#8211; and that stereotype has not kept up with the reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677509</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677509</guid>
		<description>My parents didn&#039;t know what PR was before.  Now they are really confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My parents didn&#8217;t know what PR was before.  Now they are really confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Hallett</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677500</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hallett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677500</guid>
		<description>Congrats to all involved, I&#039;ve known both of you (Joe/Jeremy) for quite a while.  It should make for some added insight that goes beyond the traditional PR thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to all involved, I&#8217;ve known both of you (Joe/Jeremy) for quite a while.  It should make for some added insight that goes beyond the traditional PR thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wright</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677495</guid>
		<description>Joe, thanks for the welcome. Lots to learn, and posts like this definitely confirm the &quot;right choice&quot; mantra I&#039;ve been singing for the last week!

Aaron, I&#039;m going to have to agree with Joe. I&#039;m a huge fan of the Edelman team and the work they&#039;re doing, approach they&#039;re taking and individuals like Rick, David Armano, Steve, Salima, Rachel, Stephan, etc in Canada/US and UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, thanks for the welcome. Lots to learn, and posts like this definitely confirm the &#8220;right choice&#8221; mantra I&#8217;ve been singing for the last week!</p>
<p>Aaron, I&#8217;m going to have to agree with Joe. I&#8217;m a huge fan of the Edelman team and the work they&#8217;re doing, approach they&#8217;re taking and individuals like Rick, David Armano, Steve, Salima, Rachel, Stephan, etc in Canada/US and UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Thornley</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677490</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Thornley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677490</guid>
		<description>Aaron, you make a good point about Ogilvy. I pay close attention to John Bell&#039;s thoughts. I simply haven&#039;t had much contact with anyone else at Ogilvy. I should take a closer look at them.

Edelman looms large for me because of people like Steve Rubel, Rick Murray and Phil Gomes. On top of that, Richard Edelman strikes me as a kindred soul in having avoided being swallowed by one of the holding companies. He&#039;s carved out his own path, which took his company into social media long before others took it seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, you make a good point about Ogilvy. I pay close attention to John Bell&#8217;s thoughts. I simply haven&#8217;t had much contact with anyone else at Ogilvy. I should take a closer look at them.</p>
<p>Edelman looms large for me because of people like Steve Rubel, Rick Murray and Phil Gomes. On top of that, Richard Edelman strikes me as a kindred soul in having avoided being swallowed by one of the holding companies. He&#8217;s carved out his own path, which took his company into social media long before others took it seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aar</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677484</link>
		<dc:creator>Aar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677484</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have never put Edelmean in that group. You might as well throw in Ogilvy as well for their Ogilvy 360. In fact, I would have taken Ogilvy over Edelman.

Congrats on getting Jeremy, though. Good land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have never put Edelmean in that group. You might as well throw in Ogilvy as well for their Ogilvy 360. In fact, I would have taken Ogilvy over Edelman.</p>
<p>Congrats on getting Jeremy, though. Good land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Portelance</title>
		<link>http://propr.ca/2010/the-new-pr-2/comment-page-1/#comment-677482</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Portelance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://propr.ca/?p=2776#comment-677482</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post, Joe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post, Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

