Be part of a crowdsourced article for Marketing Magazine
Posted by Joseph Thornley on May 1st, 2009
If you have a point of view on how the relationship of companies to consumers and communities has been changed by social media, I’d like to hear from you.
Marketing Magazine has asked several Canadian bloggers to crowdsource a feature-length article for Marketing about how people are using social media to shape perceptions of companies and brands and how companies should adjust to this new reality.
I’ve agreed to participate, along with Maggie Fox, David Jones, and Duarte Da Silva. We’re being coordinated and edited by Marketing Mag’s Jeromy Lloyd and David Crow is setting up a workspace to enable us to write and edit collaboratively.
As a first step Jeromy has suggested that we look at the crises involving Motrin, Amazon and Domino’s. This should give us a starting point to identify the issues that are involved when the online world wrests control of brands from companies.
And this is where you come in. I’d like to get some input from you about what really happened and its long term significance.
To be truthful, I rarely purchase anything from Amazon and never have used Motrin (I didn’t even know what it was prior to the Twitter storm). Nor have I ever eaten anything from Domino’s. So, my perspective on #amazonfail, #motrinmoms and #dominosvideo is that of a disinterested observer. In fact, when I first saw references to each of these, I did not follow the links. I simply did not care about the brands. However, when I saw the fourth or fifth reference to each, I followed the links. And it really didn’t take more than 15 minutes of online time for me to see enough references to pique my curiosity.
My starting point on #amazonfail is that it was largely invisible to me. I buy my books at Chapters and rarely visit Amazon. Moreover, I was offline when the initial event was noted and I caught wind of it only through Twitter. The Twitter stream suggested that Amazon had done something that offended many people. However, it wasn’t clear from the Twitter stream exactly what the problem was. This goes to show a shortcoming of many tweets. They don’t provide context. Nor do those “in the know” bother to define hashtags or remind us what they stand for.
I had a similar experience with Motrin Moms. I missed the initial weekend wave of indignation. By the time I focused on it, others had already weighed in saying that Motrin had caved too quickly (largely because they were bewildered as other non-participants in social media might be), that the reaction had been driven by one perspective (that happened to be online at that time) and that as others came online a more balanced view developed.
I tweaked a bit more quickly to the Domino’s problem. One of the first Tweets I saw included a link to the video. An immediate, visceral statement of the problem: Don’t trust the food that you receive from Domino’s (or any fast food restaurant.) Here, the problem wasn’t what people were saying about the company’s actions. The problem was video evidence of behaviour on the part of employees that fulfilled our worst fears about food preparation. This was the real world realization of the whispered tale of the “secret sauce” on Big Macs.
As a non-patron of these brands, I became aware of the controversy, but not consumed by it. I did not become engaged in the conversation. However, each controversy did affect my impression of each brand.
How about you? I’d love to hear about your take on what happened here.
- How did you find out about each of these crises? What was your reaction?
- Were your perceptions of the brands changed?
- What are the lessons we can learn and apply in the future?
I plan to use any comments I receive as input for the Marketing article. And hopefully, I’ll receive several comments and links that I can quote and point to in the article. If I do, you can be sure that I’ll give you full credit.
UPDATE 090512: Well, experiments are good. Sometimes they don’t take you where you expect to go. And that’s the case here. Marketing reassigned Jeromy to other stories and so this experiment in crowdsourcing an article ended. Nevertheless, I learned something. Crowdsourcing an article drawing on the time and expertise of several busy people is tough – even with social media tools. It takes more time and effort than you might expect.












May 1st, 2009 » 10:23 am
I’d like to incorporate your views in a crowdsourced magazine feature on social media and brands http://bit.ly/14gh1F
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
May 1st, 2009 » 11:45 am
To add but a small note for those reading and mulling this issue over…
Depending on your contributed thoughts, we may add your byline to the story. This is an experiment with crowdsourcing, and the crowd will get credit when credit is due.
May 1st, 2009 » 11:59 am
Joseph Thornley looking for input on a Marketing collaborative project: http://tinyurl.com/dffgeu
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
May 1st, 2009 » 12:47 pm
Hi Joe – Like you, I heard about these events via Twitter and while they definitely made for something to talk about during early morning coffee, I’m not convinced that all the talk really made a significant impact on traffic or sales over the long term.
Out of curiosity, I checked Google Trends and Compete to see if there were long lasting effects on searches and traffic. As expected, there was a big spike when all the hubub occured but it has all returned back to normal levels. I’m pretty sure you’d see the same thing with Amazon and Domino’s if you checked.
Motrin has suffered from bad press in the past and has emerged (at least from a traffic perspective) relatively unscathathed. Ultimately, I think it’s a factor of how effective the subsequent crisis management program is… Motrin handled things reasonably well in this case. I can’t help but think about the classic “Tylenol scandal” and Johnson and Johnson’s approach to public relations and product management over the course of these difficult times… In the face of crisis, social media-based or not, I’m not sure that things have changed that much – it’s still about gauging the severity of the situation and making timely and appropriate action.
May 1st, 2009 » 2:10 pm
” » Be part of a crowdsourced article for Marketing Magazine” from … http://bit.ly/pyg2f
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
May 1st, 2009 » 6:09 pm
” » Be part of a crowdsourced article for Marketing Magazine” from … http://bit.ly/ueItn
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
May 3rd, 2009 » 11:32 am
Molly, thanks for the thoughtful comment.
I think that a return to normal traffic levels is to be expected after any online crisis. After all, out of sight, out of mind.
Beyond this, I’d like to see whether the proportion of the online discussion that is negative increased following the crisis and if it remained at these levels. That would suggest to me some more permanent reputation damage.
The issue of speed to address the problem also seems critical to me. A quick response might cause many people to hold off on fixing their perceptions. That doesn’t mean that any quick response is good. I always look to see whether the company has been listening to people’s judgments of their behaviour and addresses these things straight on.